blog.eliduke.com

Category: media

crappy art

my sister‘s friend, tasha, visited from indiana a while back. one day while hannah was busy at work, brandon and i took tasha under our wing and went downtown with her. we first stopped off in the international district and went to Uwajimaya where tasha found a childhood favorite, Hello Panda. from there we hopped on the water front “street car” (actually just a bus dressed like a street car) and rode it all the way up to the new Olympic Sculpture Park.

overall the park is pretty cool. the landscaping is awesome, it’s right on the water, and it was a beautiful tuesday afternoon. the only thing that sucked about the whole thing were the actual sculptures: they were the crappiest bunch of crap that i’ve ever crapped. seriously. they were so stupid and pointless and “artsy” and i almost puked.

the worst of the worst was a piece entitled “adjacent, against, upon” which feature giant cement blocks and huge chunks of limestone. i’ll let the pictures speak for themselves:

UponAgainst
AdjacentAdjacent, Against, Upon

after seeing that crappy art and hardly being able to believe my own eyes, i asked google for help. here’s what this seattle times article had to say about it:

It looks so simple, you’d never imagine the hostile debate it set off. Three rough stones and three smooth geometric forms, paired up one-on-one in an elemental dance. Stretched along 130 feet of shoreline at [Olympic Sculpture] Park, Heizer’s sculpture “Adjacent, Against, Upon” first seems like nothing more than a harmonious arrangement of forms against a shimmering backdrop of sky and water.

But as you enter into the piece and explore the artist’s design, it keeps growing. You feel the force of the relationship between raw stone and sculpted cement and can start to reflect on the way civilization butts against nature, instinct against reason. Heizer’s massive haiku of a sculpture encapsulates the basic conflicts of being human.

a harmonious arrangement of forms? the basic conflicts of being human? are you fucking kidding me? can you believe that crap? i know that it was created back in the 1970s and at the time it may have been pretty cool, but those words are just about as crappy as the art they are trying to describe. i just forced myself to puked a little bit and then swallow it to get the taste of crap out of my mouth.

LOST thoughts

i wrote this post last wednesday night, but for some reason i didn’t post it at the time; i’m not sure why. anyhoo, here it is for you now:

we just finished watching the final episode of season 3 of LOST. it was amazing and wonderful and will leave me with plenty to think about for the next 7 months. until then, i’m going to give you my thoughts: there are spoilers here, so if you haven’t seen the finale yet you might want to hold off. enjoy!

jack and his “flashback”

jack’s flashback seemed to be more of a “flashforward.” i predict that for the remaining 3 seasons each episode will feature a specific character’s flashfoward instead of flashback.

the resulting contact with the boat “80 miles off-shore” will not result in rescue, which won’t happen until the end of the 6th season. therefore, over the next 3 seasons, the flashforwards will be working backwards toward the point of rescue in much the same way that during the first 3 seasons the flashbacks worked forward to the point of crash.

the two times that jack mentioned his father were just ways of trying to trick the audience: he could have easily found prescription forms of his father’s and filled them out for himself; when he told the new doctor to go find his (jack’s) father he was actually saying, “my father, on many occasions, was much worse off than i am right now, and he was never reprimanded.” he was also pretty cracked out and could have just been insane at the time.

questions

  • with almost all of the “others” now dead, where are the remaining survivors of the tail section (the flight attendant, the kids, etc)?
  • why/how was locke so certain that jack should not talk on the radio? what else did walt say to him?
  • is Naomi genuine? or is she just a really good liar? who is she really working for?
  • why did charlie think he had to die? why couldn’t he have left the control room and locked the door from the other side?

ty and emily arguing

after i got home from work today, i checked my electronic mail. i found a pretty hilarious email from flickr, and i’ll let IT do the talking:

You’ve been sent a Flickr Mail from apwbdsgirl:

Hello-

Our company, BannerCaswell Productions, likes your photo “ty and emily arguing” and would like to use it as a still in our upcoming television show, “What Happens Next“. It’s a health show that explains how our bodies react to different stimulants.

Your photo will be used in an episode regarding emotion. We will credit you at the end of the show and include your username, elisfanclub, your photo’s name, “ty and emily arguing”, and the photo’s URL. If you would like either you or your photos to be credited under a different name, please email me at xxx.

We are based in Los Angeles, CA.

Thank you.

Cheers,

Allison

and now for the award winning photo… enjoy!

ty and emily arguing

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.